EMPOWERMENT, MOTIVASI, DAN KINERJA: MENELITI DAMPAK FEEDBACK, REWARD DAN PREFERENSI RISIKO

Ana Maya Jayanti Sutikno

Abstract


Research on empowerment has been done previously by Thomas and Velthouse's
(1990), followed by Spreitzer and developed back by Drake, Wong, and Salter (2007).
Research conducted has the aim to determine whether there is causal relationship
between feedback, reward and risk preferences with the empowerment that is divided
in three dimension are impact, competence, and self-determination. Participants in
this study were students of Unika Soegijapranata, Semarang conditioned as an
employee with a random sampling. Data analysis techniques used were ANOVA and
Partial Least Square (PLS). The result can be seen that participants with feedback
condition had an influence on empowerment, empowerment dimensions, while the
impact and effect on the motivation and competence motivation has an influence on
performance. The conclusion from this study of performance-based reward and risk
preferences have no effect on empowerment, and competence dimensions of
empowerment that has no effect on motivation.

Keywords


feedback, reward, risk preferences, empowerment, impact, competence, self determination, motivation, performance

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdillah, Willy., Jogiyanto. 2009. Konsep dan Aplikasi PLS (Partial Least Square) untuk

Penelitian Empiris. Penerbit: BPFE, Yogyakarta.

Yulianto, Agus, Ak.,M.Acc, Drs. Supono. 2007. Audit Berpeduli Risiko Edisi Keempat.

BPKP.

Drake R. Andrea., Jeffrey Wong., and Salter B. Stephen. 2007. Empowerment, Motivation,

and Performance: Examining the impact of feedback and incentives on

nonmanagement employees. Behavioral Research In Accounting 19: 7189

Gibson, Ivancevich, Donnely. 1987. Fundamentals of Management. Six Edition.

Gibson, Ivancevich, Donnely. 1993. Organisasi, perilaku, Struktur dan proses, Edisi Kelima,

Cetakan Ketujuh Terjemahan Djarkasih, Penerbit Erlangga, Jakarta.

Gibson. et. al., 1995. Preproject planning process for capital facilities, Journal of

Construction Engineeringand Management, ASCE, 121 (3), 312-318.

Gibson, James L., John M. Ivancevich, James H. Donnelly Jr., and Robert Konopaske. 2003.

Organization: Nehavior, Structure, and Processes, 11th Ed. New York: McGraw-

Hill.

Ghozali, Imam. 2006. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Edisi 4.

Semarang : Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Hasibuan. 1999. Organisasi dan Motivasi Dasar Peningkatan Produktivitas. Sinar Grafika

Offset.

Jogiyanto. 2004. Metodologi penelitian bisnis, Salah kaprah dan pengalamn-pengalaman,

Edisi 2004/2005, Penerbit BPFE, Yogyakarta

John, Rawls. 1999. A Theory of Justice

Mulyadi dan Johny Setiawan. 2001. Sistem Perencanaan dan Pengendalian Manajemen:

Sistem Pelipatganda Kinerja Perusahaan, ed.2, Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Mustafa, Hasan. 2000. Teknik Sampling.

Rockhman, Wahibur Jr. 2001. Paradigma Baru Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia,

Jogjakarta: Penerbit amara Books.

Ruchala, Linda V., 1999, The Influence of Budget Goal Attainment on Risk Attitudes and

Escalation, Behavioral Research In Accounting, Vol. 11:p. 161-191

Sadarusman, Eka. 2004. Pemberdayaan: Sebuah Usaha Memotivasi Karyawan, Fokus

Ekonomi, Vol.3, No 2.

Spreitzer, G. 1995. Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions,

measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal 38 (5): 1442

Spreitzer. 1996. Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of

Management Journal 39 (2): 483504.

Thomas, K. W., and B. A. Velthouse. 1990. Cognitive elements of empowerment: An

interpretive?? model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management

Review 15: 666681.

Yolanda, Poppy. 2009. Dampak Adverse Selection Terhadap Eskalasi Komitmen dengan

Locus of Control sebagai Variabel Moderating. Universitas Katholik

Soegijapranata Semarang.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24167/jab.v11i21.430



Print ISSN : 1412-775X | online ISSN : 2541-5204 JAB Stats