Corporate Governance, Growth Opportunities dan Konservatisme Akuntansi: Bukti Empirik pada Perusahaan Manufaktur di Bursa Efek Indonesia
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of institutional ownership, managerial ownership, and growth opportunities on accounting conservatism. This study uses two control variables, namely profitability and leverage. The population in this study were all manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in 2017-2019. The sample selection using the purposive sampling technique resulted in 246 data. The test results with ordinary least square regression indicate that institutional ownership has a positive effect on accounting conservatism. Institutional shareholders become an effective supervisory mechanism so that management will act conservatively. On the other hand, managerial ownership shows the opposite result of the hypothesis, and growth opportunities have no effect on accounting conservatism. As predicted, profitability as a control variable has a positive effect on accounting conservatism, but leverage has no effect on accounting conservatism.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agustina, A., Rice, R., & Stephen, S. (2016). Akuntansi Konservatisme Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 3(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdab.v3i1.4392
Ahmed, I. E. (2020). The qualitative characteristics of accounting information, earnings quality, and islamic banking performance: evidence from the gulf banking sector. International Journal of Financial Studies, 8(30), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs8020030
Alkurdi, A., Al-Nimer, M., & Dabaghia, M. (2017). Accounting conservatism and ownership structure effect: A look at industrial and financial jordanian listed companies. Journal of Environmental Accounting and Management, 7(2), 608–619. https://doi.org/10.5890/JEAM.2017.06.007
Andreas, H. H., Ardeni, A., & Nugroho, P. I. (2017). Konservatisme Akuntansi di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 20(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.24914/jeb.v20i1.457
Asiriuwa, O., Akperi, R. T., Uwuigbe, O. R., Uwuigbe, U., Nassar, L., Ilogho, S., & Eriabe, S. (2019). Ownerships Structures and Accounting Conservatism among Nigeria Listed Firms. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 331(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/331/1/012056
Brilianti, D. P. (2013). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penerapan Konservatisme Akuntansi Perusahaan. Accounting Analysis Journal, 2(3), 268–275. https://doi.org/10.15294/aaj.v2i3.2500
CNN, I. (2019). Dua Komisaris Garuda Indonesia Tolak Laporan Keuangan. https://doi.org/https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20190424155941-92- 389264/dua-komisaris-garuda-indonesia-tolak-laporan-keuangan.
De Simone, L. (2016). Does a common set of accounting standards affect tax-motivated income shifting for multinational firms? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61(1), 145–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2015.06.002
Dechow, P., Ge, W., & Schrand, C. (2010). Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2–3), 344–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.09.001
El-haq, Z. N. S., Zulpahmi, Z., & Sumardi, S. (2019). Pengaruh Kepemilikan Manajerial, Kepemilikan Institusional, Growth Opportunities, Dan Profitabilitas Terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi. Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset), 11(2), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.17509/jaset.v11i2.19940
Fitriani, E., Maslichah, M., & Junaidi, J. (2019). Pengaruh Kepemilikan Manajerial, Growth Opportunity, dan Leverage terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi, 08(07), 14–26. Retrieved from http://riset.unisma.ac.id/index.php/jra/article/view/4227/3773
Givoly, D., & Hayn, C. (2000). The Changing Time-Series Properties of Earnings, Cash Flows and Accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29, 287–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(00)00024-0
Hakiki, L. N., & Solikhah, B. (2019). Pengaruh Corporate Governance, Investment Opportunity Set, Ukuran Perusahaan, Dan Penerapan Psak 55 Terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi. Gorontalo Accounting Journal, 2(2), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.32662/gaj.v2i2.620
Indarti, M. G. K., & Widiatmoko, J. (2021). The Effects of Earnings Management and Audit Quality on Cost of Equity Capital: Empirical Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(4), 769–776. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no4.0769
Indarti, M. G. K., Widiatmoko, J., & Pamungkas, I. D. (2020). Corporate Governance Structures and Probability of Financial Distress: Evidence From Indonesia Manufacturing Companies. International Journal of Financial Research, 12(1), 174–183. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v12n1p174
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Krismiaji, K. (2020). Struktur Kepemilikan Dan Konservatisme Akuntansi. JIAFE (Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi), 6(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.34204/jiafe.v6i2.2358
Putra, I. G. B. N. P., Sari, P. A. M. P., & Larasdiputra, G. D. (2019). Pengaruh Kepemilikan Institusional Dan Kepemilikan Manajerial Pada Konservatisme Akuntansi. Wacana Ekonomi (Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi), Vol.18(No.1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.22225/we.18.1.991.41-51
Putra, N. Y., & Subowo, S. (2016). The Effect of Accounting Conservatism, Investment Opportunity Set, Leverage, and Company Size on Earnings Quality. Accounting Analysis Journal, 5(4), 299–306. https://doi.org/10.15294/aaj.v5i4.10691
Savitri, E. (2016). Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan Institusional, Debt Covenant Dan Growth Opportunities Terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi. Jurnal Al-Iqtishad, 12(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.24014/jiq.v12i1.4444
Septian, A., & Anna, Y. D. (2014). Pengaruh Kepemilikan Manajerial, Ukuran Perusahaan, Debt Covenant, dan Growth Opportunities Terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi. In E-Proceeding of Management (Vol. 1, pp. 352–469).
Sugiarto, V. H. S., & Fachrurrozie, F. (2018). The Determinant of Accounting Conservatism on Manufacturing Companies in Indonesia. Accounting Analysis Journal, 7(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.15294/aaj.v7i1.20433
Susanti, C. M. (2018). Pengaruh Konservatisme, Leverage, Profitabilitas, Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Tax Avoidance. Jurnal Informasi, Perpajakan, Akuntansi, Dan Keuangan Publik, 13(2), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.25105/jipak.v13i2.5021
Ursula, E. A., & Adhivinna, V. V. (2018). Pengaruh Kepemilikan Manajerial, Ukuran Perusahaan, Leverage, Dan Growth opportunities Terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi. Jurnal Akuntansi, 6(2), 194–206. https://doi.org/10.24964/ja.v6i2.643
Widhiastuti, R., Nurkhin, A., & Susilowati, N. (2019). The Role of Financial Performance in Mediating The Effect of Good Corporate Governance on Financial Distress. Jurnal Economia, 15(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.21831/economia.v15i1.22927
Widiatmoko, J., & Indarti, M. G. K. (2018). Karateristik Perusahaan, Tipe Auditor dan Konsentrasi Kepemilikan Saham terhadap Pengungkapan Modal Intelektual. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Ekonomi, 25(1), 35–46. Retrieved from https://unisbank.ac.id/ojs/index.php/fe3/article/view/6964
Widiatmoko, J., & Indarti, M. G. K. (2019). Book Tax Differences, Operating Cash Flow, Leverage and Earning Persistence in Indonesia Manufacturing Companies. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi, 11(2), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.15294/jda.v11i2.20481
Widiatmoko, J., Indarti, M. G. K., & Pamungkas, I. D. (2020). Corporate governance on intellectual capital disclosure and market capitalization. Cogent Business and Management, 7(1), 0–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1750332
Wulandari, I., Andreas, A., & Ilham, E. (2014). Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan Manajerial, Debt Covenant dan Growth Opportunity terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi. JOM Fekom, 1(2), 1–15. Retrieved from http://riset.unisma.ac.id/index.php/jra/article/view/4227/3773
Yunos, R. M., Ahmad, S. A., & Sulaiman, N. (2014). The Influence of Internal Governance Mechanisms on Accounting Conservatism. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 164(March 2017), 501–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.138
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24167/jab.v18i2.3522
Print ISSN : 1412-775X | online ISSN : 2541-5204 JAB Stats