Analisis Minat Dosen dan Mahasiswa Menggunakan Online Learning: Perspektif Theory of Planned Behavior
Abstract
Peran Learning Management Systems (LMS) di hampir seluruh institusi pendidikan tinggi di seluruh dunia menjadi begitu penting dalam mendukung efektivitas proses pembelajaran. Tujuan dilakukannya penelitian ini untuk mengetahui apakah LMS telah dimanfaatkan secara maksimal oleh dosen dan mahasiswa di institusi pendidikan tinggi. Theory of Planned Behavior terbukti mampu menjelaskan seberapa besar minat menggunakan online learning dipengaruhi aspek perilaku. Pengujian dilakukan terhadap sampel penelitian meliputi dosen dan mahasiswa beberapa universitas swasta di Bandung. Hasil penelitian ini mendukung model dan hipotesis penelitian yaitu minat menggunakan online learning terbukti dipengaruhi sikap, norma subjektif serta kendali perilaku. Hal ini menjadi temuan yang bermanfaat bagi setiap perguruan tinggi agar terus melakukan pengembangan dan penyempurnaan terhadap LMS yang dimiliki karena terbukti perilaku yang positif dari dosen dan mahasiswa sebagai pengguna LMS akan memengaruhi minat untuk menggunakan online learning. Dengan demikian pemanfaatan online learning di setiap perguruan tinggi dapat berjalan efektif.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Ajzen, I. and Madden, T.J. 1986. Prediction of Goal-Directed Behavior: Attitudes, Intentions, and Perceived Behavioral Control. Journal of Experimental Social Phsycology, 22, 453-474.
Ajzen, I. 1991. The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
Al Kurdi, B., Alshurideh, M., and Salloum, S. A. 2020. Investigating a theoretical framework for e-learning technology acceptance. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), 10(6), 6484-6496.
Alsharari, N. M., and Alshurideh, M. T. 2020. Student retention in higher education: the role of creativity, emotional intelligence and learner autonomy. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(1), 233-247.
Cheng-Tsung Lu, C., Yan Huang, S., and Yen Lo, P. 2010. An empirical study of on-line tax filing acceptance model: Integrating TAM and TPB. African Journal of Business Management, Vol. 4(5), pp. 800-810. http://www.academicjournals.org/AJBM’
Chin, W.W. 2010. How to Write Up and Report PLS Analyses. In: Esposito Vinzi, V., Chin, W.W., Henseler, J. and Wang, H., Eds. Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications. Springer, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York, 655-690.
Chu, T.-H., and Chen, Y.-Y. 2016. With Good, We Become Good: Understanding e-learning adoption by the theory of planned behavior and group influences. Computers & Education, 92-93, 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.013.
Elisabect dan Lingga, Ita Salsalina. 2022. Analisis Minat Penggunaan E-Filing Menggunakan Theory of Planned Behavior. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, Vol. 20, No. 1.
Fishbein M. and Ajzen I. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. 2020. Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. Psychology Press (Taylor & Francis).
Galanek, Joseph D., Gierdowski, Dana C., and Brooks, Christopher D. 2018. EDUCAUSE Center for Analysis and Research. https://www.educause.edu/ecar/research-publications/ecar-study-of-undergraduate-students-and-information-technology/2018/ introduction-and-key-findings.
Ghozali, Imam. 2011. Structural Equation Modeling Metode Alternatif Dengan Partial Least Square (PLS). Edisi 3, Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang.
Hair, Joseph F., G. Tomas M. Hult, Christian M. Ringle, and Marko, Sarstedt. 2017. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). 2nd ed, Sage, USA.
Ham, M., Jeger, M. and Ivković, Anita F. 2015. The role of subjective norms in forming the intention to purchase green food. Economic Research Ekonomska Istraživanja, 28:1, 738-748. DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2015.1083875.
Ilyas, Asifa and Zaman, Muhammad K. 2020. An evaluation of online students’ persistence intentions. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, Vol. 15 No. 2, 2020 pp. 207-222. Emerald Publishing Limited. DOI 10.1108/AAOUJ-11-2019-005.
Khan, S. A., Zainuddin, M., Mahi, M., and Arif, I. 2020. Behavioral Intention to Use Online Learning During COVID19: An analysis of The Technology Acceptance Model. International Conference on Innovative Methods of Teaching and Technological Advancements in Higher Education at European University,Georgia on December 15, 2020.
Khana, O., Dadddi, T., Slabbinckc, H., Kleinhansa, K., Vazquez-Brustd, D., De Meestera, S. 2020. Assessing the determinants of intentions and behaviors of organizations towards a circular economy for plastics. Resouces, Conservation & Recycling, 163 (2020) 105069.
Kim, E.-J., Kim, J.J., and Han, S.H. 2021. Understanding Student Acceptance of Online Learning Systems in Higher Education: Application of Social Psychology Theories with Consideration of User Innovativeness. Sustainability, 13, 896. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su13020896.
Lang, L. 2016. EDUCAUSE Core Data Service Benchmarking report 2016. Retrieved from. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2017/4/2016-educause-core-data-service-cds-benchmarking-report.
Lung-Guang, N. 2019. Decision-making determinants of students participating in MOOCs: Merging the theory of planned behavior and self-regulated learning model. Computers & Education, Vol. 134, page 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.004.
Mailizar, M., Burg, D., and Maulina, S. 2021. Examining University Students’ Behavioural Intention to Use e-Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Extended TAM Model. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6):7057–7077. doi: 10.1007/s10639 -021-10557-5.
Mouloudj, K., Bouarar, A. C., and Stojczew, K. 2021. Analyzing the students' intention to use online learning system in the context of COVID-19 pandemic: A theory of planned behavior approach. In W. B. James, C. Cobanoglu, & M. Cavusoglu (Eds.). Advances in global education and research, Vol. 4, pp. 1-17. USF M3 Publishing. https://www.doi.org/10.5038/9781955833042.
Ndubisi, N. O. 2006. Factors of online learning adoption: A Comparative Juxta Position of The Theory of Planned Behavior and The Tchnology Acceptance Model. International Journal on E-Learning, 5(4), 571–591.
Ngafeeson, M. N., and Gautam, Y. 2021. Learning management system adoption: A theory of planned behavior approach. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), 16(1), 27- 42. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJWLTT.2021010104.
Nisa, Ulfa K. and Solekah, Nihayatu A. 2022. The influence of TAM, social influence, security relationship toward intention to use e wallet through attitude and trust. Iqtishoduna: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam, 18 (1). pp. 35-50. ISSN 1829-524X.
Regmi, K., and Jones, L. 2020. A systematic review of the factors-enablers, and barriers- affecting e-learning in health sciences education. BMC Medical Education, 20, 91. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02007-6.
Rizun, Mariia and Strzelecki, Arthur. 2020. Students’ Acceptance of the COVID-19 Impact on Shifting Higher Education to Distance Learning in Poland. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 6468. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186468.
Samsudeen, S.N., and Mohamed, R. 2019. University students’ intention to use e-learning systems: A study of higher educational institutions in Sri Lanka Interactive Technology and Smart Education., 16(3), 219-238. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-11-2018-0092.
Stockless , A. 2018. Acceptance of Learning Management System: The case of Secondary School Teachers. Education and Information Technologies. 23(3):1101–1121. doi: 10.1007/s10639-017-9654-6.
Tang, Ying and Hew, Khe F. 2019. Examining the utility and usability of mobile instant messaging in a graduate-level course: A usefulness theoretical perspective. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 128-143. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.14742/ajet.4571.
Tondeur, J.; Pareja Roblin, N.; Van Braak, J.; and Voogt, J.; Prestridge, S. 2017. Preparing Beginning Teachers for Technology Integration in Education: Ready for Take-Off? Technology. Pedagogy and Education. 26(2):157–177. doi: 10.1080/1475939X. 2016.1193556.
Wang, T., Lin, C-L., and Su, Y-S. 2021. Continuance Intention of University Students and Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Modified Expectation Confirmation Model Perspective. Sustainability, 13(8), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084586.
Watkins, K. 2020. Technology in schools-a tool and a strategy. Toronto, ON: People for Education.
Zaharah, Z., Kirilova, G.I., and Windarti, A. 2020. Impact of corona virus outbreak towards teaching and learning activities in Indonesia. SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i, 7(3), 269-282.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24167/jab.v21i2.10926
Print ISSN : 1412-775X | online ISSN : 2541-5204 JAB Stats