An Investigation of Proxemic Behavior among Acehnese in Public Places
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agnus, O. M. (2012). Proxemics: the study of space. IRWLE, 8(1), 1-7.
Ballendat, T.,Marguardt, N., & Greenberg, S. (2010). Proxemic interaction: designing for a proximity and orientation-aware environment. In the proceedings of ITS, November 7-10, pp. 121-130. Saarbrucken, Germany.
Celik, S. (2005). Get your face out of mine: Culture-Oriented Distance In EFL Context-A Helpful Guide for Turkish EFL Teachers. TÖMER Language Journal, 128, 37-50.
Clark, (2006). Anonimysing research data. Leeds: ESRC National Center for Research Methods, University of Leeds.
Eresha, G., Haring, M., Endrass, B., Andr, E., & Obaid, M. (2013). Investigating the Influence of Culture on Proxemic Behaviors for Humanoid Robots. In the proceedings of the 22nd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, August 26-29, pp. 430-43, Gyeongju, Korea.
Gharaei, F. M. N., & Rafieian, M. R. (2013). Investigating Cross-Cultural Differences in Personal Space: Kurdish and Northern women in Iran. Journal of Asian Behavioural Studies, 3(8), 70-78.
Hall, E. T. (1963). A System for the Notation of Proxemic Behavior. American Anthropologist, 65(5), 1003–1026. doi:10.1525/aa.1963.65.5.02a00020.
Hall, E. T. (1990). The hidden dimension. New York: Garden City.
Hall, E. T. (1991). A First Look at Communication Theory. In E. M. Griffin (Ed.), A First Look at Communication Theory. New York: McGraw Hill.
Ismail, N. M. (2017). “That’s the biggest impact!” Pedagogical values of movies in ELT classrooms. Studies in English Language and Education, 4(2), 216-225.
Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M., & Saldana, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis. London: SAGE publications.
Ningrum, P. (1998). Personal space pada mahasiswa (Studi pada kelompok mahasiswa di Kantin Fakultas Sastra Universitas Indonesia) [Personal space for students (Study in a group of students in the Canteen of the Faculty of Literature, University of Indonesia)] (Unpublished bachelor thesis. Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta). Retrieved from http://lib.ui.ac.id/opac/themes/libri2/detail.jsp?id=20286939&lokasi=lokal
Parker, L., & Leo, T. (2011). Proxemics distance and gender amongst Australians. Griffith working papers in pragmatics and intercultural communications, 4(1), 19-25.
Pasaribu, T. A., & Kadarisman, A. E. (2016). Coding logical mechanism and stereotyping in gender cyber humors. Celt: A Journal of Culture, English Language, Teaching & Literature, 16(1), 22-48.
Prawitasari, M. (2009). Pengaruh kualitas ruang terhadap intimate distance berdasarkan gender [The effect of room quality on intimate distance based on gender] (Unpublished bachelor thesis, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta).
Sameer, I. H. (2017). The analysis of speech acts patterns in two Egyptian inaugural speeches. Studies in English Language and Education, 4(2), 134-147.
Suprihadi., & Rokhayani, A. (2016). Relationship between gender, subject preference and learning styles. Celt: A Journal of Culture, English Language, Teaching & Literature, 16(2), 242-270.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24167/celt.v18i2.1272
Copyright (c) 2018 Celt: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching & Literature
| pISSN (print): 1412-3320 | eISSN (online): 2502-4914 | View My Stats